Tampilkan postingan dengan label the. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label the. Tampilkan semua postingan

ThinkPad W540 The most wanted ThinkPad this year

Senin, 09 Maret 2015

http://www.lenovo.com/images/gallery/560x345/lenovo-laptop-thinkpad-w540-main.png

First up is what Lenovo calls its most powerful mobile workstation ever, the ThinkPad W540 -- clearly aimed at competing with the notebooks like the latest high-powered M-Series Precision models from Dell. The Chinese manufacturer backs its claim up with the inclusion of a 15.5-inch 3K IPS display, delivering a 2,880 x 1,620 resolution. While powered by Intels quad-core i7 processor, the W540 takes it to the next level with NVIDIAs latest flagship Quadro GPU and support for up to 32GB of RAM and a full two terabytes of storage. Thats all packed into a chassis that measures 27mm at its thickest point, weighs 5.45 pounds and delivers around six hours on a full charge of its six-cell removable battery. Lenovo has yet to set a price for the W540 but says itll go on sale in November.
This portable 15.6" workstation is the thinnest and lightest in its class, yet sacrifices nothing in terms of speed, power, and durability. Graphics-intensive, ISV-certified applications with blazing-fast processing and advanced graphics technology, plus ThinkPads known reliability, mean you can handle any heavy-computational task from anywhere you want to be.
Does it make you hungry? Keep your eye on: http://shop.lenovo.com/us/en/laptops/thinkpad/w-series/w540/

Ref: http://www.engadget.com/2013/09/11/lenovo-thinkpad-business-notebooks-haswell/
Read More..

Recs for the week of October 17

Minggu, 01 Maret 2015

This weeks recs are now posted. The stories for this week are:

Your Voice Was All I Heard by Twimamma  and Amaranth by DreamingPoet1988

Be sure to head over to the Weekly Recs page to check out the reviews for each of these stories, and dont forget, if you have a story youd like to see on our list of weekly recs, click on the link to the form to rec a fic to us on the homepage.
Read More..

Prepositional Verbs and Verbs with Prepositional Phrases Whats the Difference

Kamis, 26 Februari 2015


First of all, whats a prepositional verb? A prepositional verb is a verb followed by a preposition, where the meaning is dependent on the combination of both items. For example :

Hes looking after the children today.
Hes looking for a new secretary.
Hes looking into the problem.


In none of these sentences does it make sense to ask What does "look" mean? On its own, it means nothing. The meaning is formed through the combination of the verb and preposition (look after = take care of; look for = try to find; look into = investigate).

So, if you change the preposition in any of these sentences then the meaning of the whole verb changes. 

Now consider the following sentences :

He looked into the box, but couldnt find anything.
He looked behind the box, but couldnt find anything.
He looked under the box, but couldnt find anything.

Here look is not a prepositional verb. Its an ordinary verb with its own meaning - look = direct your gaze. And this doesnt change regardless of what preposition is used. The preposition simply introduces a prepositional phrase telling us the direction of the gaze, which could be any direction at all. 
In addition, the prepositional phrase is an optional component  : He looked, but couldnt find anything. Thats not true of the sentences with prepositional verbs.

So - not every verb which happens to be followed by a preposition is a prepositional verb. Test yourself to see if youve understood : which of the following are prepositional verbs (answers below).


1. It took me ages to get over the flu.
2. We had trouble getting into the house.
3. I ran into David in the market.
4. She ran round the park.
5. He really takes after his father.

Not every verb + preposition combination is quite as clear cut as this. There are some cases where the preposition is not totally interchangeable, but on the other hand does not alter the meaning of the verb. For example :

He applied for the job.

Can you change the preposition here? Obviously, if you want to continue the sentence with the job, then no. The preposition is dependent on the verb - it doesnt have an independent meaning - and for this reason this sort of combination is generally classed as a prepositional verb (see eg Leech and Svartvik 1975). But consider the following :

He applied to IBM, but didnt get an interview.
He applied several times, but didnt get an interview.

Whether apply is used with a different preposition, or with no preposition at all, the meaning of the verb remains the same - and as we saw above, that cant happen with our "pure" prepositional verbs. Id therefore argue that these verbs fall into the category of verb + prepositional phrase, rather than of prepositional verbs.


Reference

Leech, G and Svartvik, J (1975)  A Communicative Grammar of English,  Longman

Related posts in the ELT Notebook
Multiword Verbs




Answers : 1/3/5 = Prepositional verbs 
Read More..

Teaching Numbers and the Time A Game

Rabu, 25 Februari 2015

Teaching numbers

Numbers are often problematic for both beginner and higher level learners, and students need regular and ample chance to practise them. Low numbers are generally brought into beginners courses quite early on, but even these create difficulties. They may have difficulty remembering the way three changes to thir- in thirteen and thirty, and similarly five to fif-. Or problems with pronunciation and stress patterns may lead to them confusing thirteen fourteen, thirty and forty. When high numbers are introduced, if they’re using British English, they’ll have problems remembering where to put the and : two thousand three hundred and twenty not two thousand and three hundred and twenty.

This activity aims to give students practice in pronouncing these numbers. You can adapt it to include only the numbers which the students have learnt up to that point, but I’ll describe it here using both low and very high numbers.

You need to make a series of cards with a number in figures (eg 10) on one side and in words (eg ten) on the other. The game can be played in pairs or in larger groups – six or seven is fine. The bigger the group the more cards you need on the table – aim for at at least ten per student.

The cards are laid out on the table number side up. In turn, each student chooses a card, says what s/he thinks will be on the other side, and then turns the card over. If s/he has said exactly what is written there, s/he keeps the card. If not, the card is turned back over and left on the table. The next student can’t choose the same card, but the student after that is free to do so if s/he wishes. At the end, the student with the most cards is the winner.

This seems simple, and with very low level students who are just learning the initial numbers it is best left like that. However, at a later stage it becomes more complex – what is written on the card is not always the exact number. For example, the student who sees 203 and says two hundred and three may turn the card over to find about two hundred. Some of the numbers will be exact, others approximations.

This has two advantages :

  • Firstly, it extends the game. The student who says two hundred and three has had productive practice in pronouncing the exact number, but has also had receptive exposure to the approximation – which s/he or another student must later use. It may of course work the other way – the student who sees 4,999 and, thinking s/he has understood the trick, says about five thousand may turn the card over to find four thousand, nine hundred and ninety nine, or more or less five thousand.
  • Secondly it helps the weaker students. Played the “straight” way, inevitably the weaker students make mistakes and have to turn the card back over while the stronger ones get it right first time. Introducing the element of chance means that, even if they have said something perfectly correct, the stronger students still may not win the card, and having already seen the correct version the weaker students have a better chance of being right when they pick it up.

A Variation : Telling the Time

The game can also be used to practise expressing the time. By far the simplest way of expressing the time is to use the hour/minutes system - It’s ten twenty five. This is the system which I teach immediately to beginners. However, by the late elementary level they also need to understand the ten past two/twenty to twelve system (or the American equivalent). Once this has been presented and practised in isolation, the game can be used to integrate the two.

In this version, the cards have a clock showing the time on one side, and the written time on the other. But for eg 9.20, the card may say either it’s nine twenty or it’s twenty past nine. Times like 10.24 may be expressed as its ten twenty four, it’s twenty four minutes past ten or as it’s almost ten twenty five, it’s about twenty five past ten etc. The amount of uncertainty makes it very unlikely that the cards will be guessed first time, and vastly increases the amount of both receptive exposure and productive practice which the students receive.

For both variations of the game there are more approximating expressions which could be used. For numbers -ne
arly, almost, just over, just under, around, around about, approximately, coming up for, a bit more/less than, and for times nearly, almost, just gone, around, approximately, coming up for etc. It goes without saying that the exact number of possibilities should be geared to the level and ability of the students : too simple and it’s boring, but too difficult and it’s demotivating. It’s up to the teacher to decide how many different expressions to include – perhaps none at all for complete beginners, but a lot if you want to use the game as a remedial activity at intermediate level.

Read More..

An ELT Glossary The Affective Filter Hypothesis

Selasa, 17 Februari 2015



Definition One of the five hypotheses in the Monitor Model proposed by Krashen in his work in the seventies and eighties.

Krashen  proposed the idea of an "affective filter" in the brain. Negative affective factors (by "affect" we mean emotions and psychological states like motivation, depression, fear,self-esteem, enthusiasm etc) would cause the "filter " to be raised and to block learning/acquisition from taking place, while positive affective factors would cause it to be lowered, facilitating intake.


Krashen was not the first person to link affective factors to the effectiveness of learning. He drew directly on the work of Dulay and Burt (1977), but the idea (if not the name) is common in all writers on humanistic education, whether general education (eg Rogers) or within the humanistic movement in EFL - which was in full swing when Krashen started writing. 


Reference : Dulay, H. and M. Burt, “Remarks on creativity in language acquisition,” in M. Burt, H. Dulay and M. Finnochiaro (eds), Viewpoints on English as a Second Language, Regents, New York, pp. 95-126, 1977


Further reading : Baker, C. and Prys Jones, S. Encyclopedia of Bilingualism and Second Language Acquisition
Read More..